Kahn reflects on the different issues that arise when justifying human cloning, challenge ones dignity and ethical perspectives. It could give someone the efficiency to function a diseases or disorders that they may otherwise pass remote from. Pargonnts may also be able to ensure that certain(a) genes are passed on to their offspring, or once sterile individuals leave behind be able to have their own biological offspring. Kahn questions if these methods are really worth that of human action and its dignity. human life should never be thought of only as means, except always as an end. (Alex Kahn, 1997, 2005, p93).
Cloning can also shoot the breeze a threat on humanity; he compares what smart set would be like if parents were allowed to have biological predetermination, giving them the ability to choose key traits of their offspring and the unpredictability of ones offspring during natural development. Individuals are becoming fanatical with their genes being passed on to their offspring; they do not seem to look about the ability to pass on emotional and heathenish traits as well.
References
Khan. A (2005). Clone Mammalsâ¦Clone Man? In S.D. Scott, D. Perkins, & E.Rothwell
(Eds.), Intersections: Readings in the sciences and humanities (2nd ed., pp. 91- 93). Toronto,
ON: Pearsons Educations Canada. (Reprinted from The Sciences,1995,Novemeber/December)If you want to turn a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment