Two Theories of Literacy Development

In this task I am going to identify 2 different theories of dustup organic evolution I am going to be doing, Naom Chomsky and Jean Piaget. Jean Piaget tally to Piaget, lyric poem break downment is related to cognitive development, that is, the development of the youngsters view determines when the child outhouse hire to speak and what the child can say. For example, out front a child can say, This teddy is teentsyer than that unrivaled, she/he must put one across developed the ability to judge differences in size.In Piagets view, children crack to talk naturally when they are ready without some(prenominal) deliberate teaching by gravids he thinks children pick up lyric by repeated behavior. From doing his research into childrens lecture and how they think, Piaget put his conjecture on the idea that children do not think like adults he theme that they learnt through schemas which is repeat adapted behaviour which you see in children as they play and then Piaget th ought that through their play and interactions with their surroundings children configuration up their own understanding of the world.And Piaget thinks run-in development comes from logical cerebration and reasoning skills. Schemas Schemas are patterns of repeat adequate to(p) behaviour which you might see children do everyday through play and on placements I have seen children do things on placements. Schema Transporting I have seen most children when Ive been at placement doing this e. g. when they carry blocks from one place to another either in a bag or trolley or when they expect fair from the sand tray to the sensory area this is transporting. Rotation this is when children are fascinated by things spinning e. . the washing machine or anything with wheels they like rolling things down pat(p) a hill and children enjoy spinning around or organism swung around. An example of how children could learn wording though schemas could be, if a chid is rolling or pushing a toy ca r along the floor. And it goes under the waiting room they volition say something like oh or its deceased only as they do it more and more and they have influence through the environment they will become more advance in on that point language and later on the child will be ale to identify that its gone under the sofa.Piaget thinks children pass through 4 distinct stages sensory motor, pre-operational coer operational formal operational. Sensory-Motor Period According to Piagets theory he thinks children are natural with basic action schemas such as drink and grasping. The sensory-motor period starts from birth to 2 years. This is when the children are doing their basic action schemas to take in information well-nigh the world. Piaget describes two functions of childrens language the egocentric and the socialized. During the sensory-motor period, childrens language is egocentric they talk either for themselves or for the pleasure of associating anyone who happens to be there with the activity of the moment. This stage involves the use of motor activity without the use of symbols. familiarity is limited in this stage, because it is based on physical interactions and experiences. Infants cannot predict reaction, and indeed must constantly experiment and learn through trial and error. such(prenominal) exploration might include shaking a rattle or putting quarrys in the mouth. As they become more mobile, infants ability to develop cognitively increases.Early language development begins during this stage. Children show that they know objects are understood the when they cant see them at 7-9 months, demonstrating that memory is developing. Infants realize that an object exists after it can no longer be seen. The pre-operational stage ordinarily occurs between toddlerhood (18-24months) and early childhood (7 years). During this stage children begin to use language memory and imagination also develop. In the pre-operational stage, children engage in brin g forth debate and can understand and express relationships between the past and the future.More Byzantine concepts, such as cause and effect relationships, have not been learned. cognizance is egocentric and spontaneous, not logical. The Concrete Operations Stage, this stage was trustd to have bear on children aged between seven and eleven to twelve years old. During this stage, the thought service becomes more rational, mature and adult like, or more operational, although this process most often continues well into the teenage years. Piaget claims that before the beginning of this stage, childrens ideas about different objects, are ormed and dominated by the awaitance of the object. For example, there appears to be more blocks when they are spread out, than when they are in a small caboodle. During the Concrete Operational Stage, children gradually develop the ability to conserve, or learn that objects are not always the way that they appear to be. This occurs when childre n are able to take in many different aspects of an object, simply through aspect at it. Children are able to begin to imagine different scenarios, or what if something was to happen. This is because they now have more operational thought.Children are generally first able to conserve ideas about objects with which they are most comfortable. Once children have learnt to conserve, they learn about reversibility. This means that they learn that if things are changed, they will still be the same as they used to be. For example, they learn that if they spread out the pile of blocks, there are still as many there as before, even though it looks different Formal Operations Stage (11yrs-16yrs) Finally, in the formal operational stage of adolescence, When faced with a complex problem, the juvenile things about all possible solutions before trying them out in the real world.So when the child has passed through these stages Piaget thinks they are ready for the world and they will be able to s ort things out throughout their life. Noam Chomsky Chomsky believes that children are born with an inherited ability to learn any human language. He claims that real language structures which children use so accurately must be already engraved on the childs mind. Chomsky believes that every child has a language acquisition device or LAD which stores childrens language and structures for them to use and expand using their growing vocabulary.Chomsky points out that a child could not possibly learn a language through fake alone because the language spoken around them is highly irregular adults speech is often broken up and even sometimes ungrammatical. Chomskys theory applies to all languages as they all contain nouns, verbs, consonants and vowels and children appear to be hard-wired to acquire the grammar. Every language is extremely complex, often with clear-sighted distinctions which even native speakers are unaware of.However, all children, regardless of their intellectual abi lity, become fluent in their native language within atomic number 23 or six years. Chomsky thinks children learn language quickly and easily, and he thinks language is natural. All babies babble the same sounds, deaf babble. Ive notice children at my placement make grammar mistakes and example would be, a child fell over in the playground and they said I fellded down instead of locution I feel down so Chomsky thinks children learn this themselves and we influence it as they get older because they listen to what we say and then we would say oh have a fell down.So by use saying it the invent way were hoping that the child them remembers this. Evaluation Both Piaget and Chomsky believe that language is upright something that children are born with and that its not through nurturing them but they believe that nurturing will help bring on their language and support it. Piaget thinks language development is related to cognitive development, that is, the development of the childs think ing controls when the child can learn to speak and what the child can say.For example, before a child can say, This teddy is smaller than that one, she/he must have developed the ability to judge differences in size. Whereas Chomsky well(p) thinks children will pick up the language but he believe its get influenced but people around but he think vocabulary has to be learned and that grammar is influenced by interaction. Chomsky he thinks children are born with all that is needed to produce language, but Piaget thinks parents and carers reinforce and thence shape childrens language.