Freedom vs. Security         On September 11th, 2001, an attack was made on The United States of America. Nineteen terrorists boarded and hijacked four passenger airlines, and used them as weapons against buildings in New York and Washington D.C. The fourth plane was brought good deal in rural Pennsylvania. Over 3,000 lives were lost in these attacks, and umteen more were ruined by the loss of family, friends, and coworkers. To prevent a reoccurrence of the events of 9-11-01, security policies have been changed, raw(a) measures taken, and national awareness heightened. However, new security measures have a tendency to take forward some of our civil liberties as citizens of a democracy. This atrocity brought slightly a new debate within our nation and its leaders. whatsoever say individual freedoms can be sacrificed for the sake of safety. Others potently disagree and claim that is a disgrace to our constitution, history and region to take such measures. I agree with those who support heightened security, disrespect some of the constraints that may be placed on indisputable liberties.
        After the attacks of September 11th, soldiers of the National Guard have been on station in the aerodromes across the nation. Soldiers pacing around an airport garbed in full battle gear, armed with unbidden rifles is a new sight for most American citizens.
However, if ane were to travel to almost any other country in the world, (especially in Europe) this sight would be a common, everyday reality. This is something that we Americans should arrange to, for our own safety. Some believe that military presence in a civilian setting represents the characteristics of a socialist, communist, or undemocratic regime, and not that of a free democracy. This is not necessarily unbowed; for freedom comes at a price. I dont mind if soldiers essential be stationed on...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment