A "Brave New World"-perspective analysis on the subject of Hedonism.

Imagine Brenda, a woman who will non under each circumstances craftiness her t wiz in send to be conditi geniusd, and then bouncy as a Beta in the Brave New World (BNW), universe. If this is the case, then Brenda could not systematic entirelyy accept Hedonism. This is due to the definition of Hedonism, the make sense and intensity of bodily pleasance in Brave New World (BNW), and the amount and intensity of bodily joyfulness here in accepted sustenance.

The definition of Hedonism leads genius to maximize the amount of merriment and under reconcile the amount of perturb: The only thing indispensable ally comfortably in smell is joyfulness, and the only thing intrinsically knotty in bread and butter is disoblige. Other things in life shoot extrinsic value - they displace lead to either pain or pleasure, but do not produce the sensations by themselves. However, Hedonists argon only concerned with pleasure and pain, as these are the only intrinsic values. The distinctive factor that delineates a relegate life from a worse one, is the amount of web pleasure in one?s life. The engagement pleasure is resolute by subtracting the amount of pain in one?s life from the amount of pleasure. Notice that Hedonism only determines better lives from worse ones, not advanced from bad. To make the distinction between tidy and bad is an arbitrary decision and cannot be measured finished a comparable medium such as net pleasure. Quantitative Hedonism states that quantity and intensity are the only criteria that determine just how good a certain pleasure is.

If all pleasures differ only in quantity and duration, then the humanity in BNW is a dream for hedonists. nonpareil?s life in BNW is conditioned to be content and happy with one?s, job, class in life, and the daily schedule of life. This schedule for one?s life never changes and so delivers a maximum amount of pleasure due to being happy and content. senior high pleasure in BNW likewise comes from the open sexual dealings between people. Basically, it is encouraged from childhood to rich person as umpteen sex partners as possible, therefore maximizing the amount of pleasure from sex. The drug of choice in BNW is called Soma, and it delivers an amazing feeling without some(prenominal) hangover effect like alcohol. This drug is distributed daily at one?s work to maximize one?s amount of body pleasure. With all of these factors enhancing pleasure, it is also important to state that not much takes pain for one?s life in BNW. There are no personal relationships to cause pain, jobs and education are given specifically for people, and life is genuinely much planned and repetitive. This repetition is what maximizes the amount and duration of pleasure in BNW lives. In real life, there does not go anything like the above mentioned pleasures, in either quantity or duration. Therefore, when comparing the net pleasure of a life in BNW to a real earthly life, a hedonist finds that BNW lives render a high net pleasure, and are frankincense off the beaten track(predicate) better. This is because they in BNW have much more intrinsically good pleasure, and much less disappointment and intrinsically bad events. So, if Brenda refuses to trade her life in order to be conditioned and live a BNW life, then she could not consistently accept hedonism because handicraft her life would give her a higher net pleasure, and by definition, a better life.

Brenda even could accept hedonism if she accepted qualitative hedonism, based on Mill?s distinction between ?higher? and ?lower? pleasures. According to Mill?s, certain pleasures have a distinct higher value than other pleasures. This can be due to a mere preference for one pleasure over another, with the preferred pleasure having more intrinsic value because it is preferred, and thus more net pleasure. This can also be due preferring higher intellectual ?mind? pleasures, as opposed to body pleasures like those in BNW. Mill?s distinction goes hand in hand with qualitative hedonism, which adds tonicity to the criteria distinguishing pleasure (intensity and duration).



Higher quality pleasure are broadly speaking thought to be intellectual and creative pleasures as compared to swinish pleasures. Intimate relationships can also be thought of as being a higher quality pleasure. It is not substantial, however, that these higher pleasures merely exist - for a hedonist, these higher pleasure mustiness contribute to a higher net pleasure in life in order to be of value. Since there are absolutely no intellectual or intimate pleasures in BNW, the argument could be do that the intellectual and intimate pleasures in real life give higher net pleasure, and thus a better life. This theory also takes into account the pain that may be caused by relationships or by not attaining certain intellectual milestones. However, the argument can be made that the pleasure derived from these higher pleasures far surpasses any pain caused by them and guarantees a higher net pleasure than any life in BNW. If Brenda adopts this method of thinking, then she could both accept hedonism and still not want to trade her life for a life in BNW.

A qualitative hedonist, in order to consistently believe that actual life is better, must claim that the general net pleasure one receives in real life is more than the net pleasure one receives in the BNW universe. One must claim that experiences in actual life, including but not limited to intellectual and intimate pleasures, produce more net pleasure than a life of bestial pleasures in BNW. This includes all of the pain and hardships experienced in real life, but not in BNW. The argument is that even with all of this pain, the net pleasure is still higher in real life. This is also what Brenda must adhere to if she wishes to not trade her real life for a conditioned BNW life.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper