Writing tips and writing guidelines for students. Case study samples, admission essay examples, book reviews, paper writing tips, college essays, research proposal samples.
Tuesday, April 2, 2019
The Four Main Sources Of Islamic Law Religion Essay
The Four Main Sources Of Moslem Law Religion EssayAbstract This chapter deals with the four main sources of Moslem Law. Its goal is to introduce nigh of the prevailing concepts of Islamic thought and to take the different disciplines and popular opinions that shape the practice of Islam to daytime. It is known that thither ar four Muslim schools of thoughts. However, each differs in their interpretations . The primary sources, accepted universally by all Muslims, argon the playscript and the hadith. It is however, in field that they argon close that the second baseary sources are to be used, thus the Ijma (consensus of opinion of scholars) and the Qiyas( law of natures derived through nonliteral deduction - comparison).IntroductionIn the eighth century, a difference in juristic approach arose amongst Islamic thinkers in two prevailing schools of thought. The usancealists (ahl al-hadith) relied entirely on the playscript and the hadith (traditions) of the oracle as t he only reasonable sources for jurisprudence, emanating from Medina. The non traditional approach (ahl al-ray) relied on the free use of argumentation and opinion in the absence of reliable ahadith, heralded in iraq .The difference in technique is because in Medina, on that point was an anundance of reliable ahadith that scholars could depend from, since the prophet lived the 1o yrs of his carriage there. On the other hand, the non traditionalist jurists had to depend on analogy as the sources were not as reliable in Iraq. The jurists had therefore to decide which of the seers swear outs and decisions were conscientiously binding and which were a mere function of his personal discretion.In universal, the traditionalists eventuallt impart legislative significance to much of the Prophets decisions, where as the other school of thoughts tended to deal between the miscellaneous roles that the Prophet played in his life.The sources of Islamic law was thus, playscript, Sunnah , ijma and qiyaThroughout history these sources wereused in descendind order by Muslim jurists in determining the ratifiedity of an issue. If the levelheadedity was not based on an declared command in the quran, then the jurists would turn to the explicit commands in the hadith. rule book is the religious text of Islam. It is supposed to be the word of God transfer through the Prophet Muhammad.1The Sunnah is considered to be the religious actions, quotations and approvals of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad, which was narrated through his Companions and Shia Imams. The script and the Sunnah state all the way the course of action that a Muslim should follow. account bookThe Arabic word Quran is derived from the make up qaraa, which means to read or to recite. Quran is the holy book of Islam. Muslimsbelieve that the Quran is the final examination revelation of Allah, that is, the literal word of God, revealed to the ProphetMuhammad. The Quran was written and preserved during the l ife of Muhammad, and compiled soon after his death. The Quran consists of114surahs(chapters) with over 6,000ayat,( writes). However the exact number of ayat is disputed due to different methods of counting.The Quran is the first and most important source of Islamic law. The scripture specifies the deterrent example, philosophical, social, political andeconomicbasis on which a society should be constructed.Muslim jurists agree that the Quran in its entirety is not a legal code quite its purpose is to lay down a charge of life which regulates mans relationship with others and God.The verses of the Quran are categorized into tercet fields science of speculative theology, ethical principles and rules of human conduct. The third category is instantaneously concerned with Islamic legal matters which contains near five hundred verses or unrivaled thirteenth of it. The task of interpreting the Quran has led to various opinions and judgments. The interpretations of the verses by Muha mmads companions for Sunnis andImamsfor Shias are considered the most authentic, since they knew why, where and on what occasion each verse was revealed.The sharia, foundations of Islamic law, are derived from verses from the Quran. The bulk of Quranic matter consists mainly of broad, general incorrupt directives as to what the aims and aspirations of Muslims should be, the ought of the Islamic religious ethic.The most important external back up used in interpreting the meanings of the Quran is theHadith the collecting of Islamic traditions from which the details of early Islamic history are derived.The Shariah, foundatiosn of Islamic law, are derived from verses from the Quran. The Quran consists mainly of broad general moral directives that provide for the aims and objectives of a muslim. Essentially() because the directives are so broad, interpretation takes on a significant role, there turn in been so m whatever different interpretations of the quran, outcrys widely read an d august Islamic thinker Abdul Aala Maududi that there is hardly to be found any(prenominal) command with an agreed interpretation.Nevertheless, the authenticity of quran has never been questioned by any muslim scholar or institution.Textual Criticism and the Quranhigher(prenominal) biblical criticism revolutionized Judaism and Christianity by calling into question long-held assumptions about the origins of the playscript some ambitious textual critics are attempting to do the same for the Quran. They claim that parts of the Quran are based on stories of theTanakh(Hebrew Bible), theNew willof theChristianBible, and other non-canonical Christian works differences of the biblical to the Quranic versions suggest to some scholars that these stories were not taken directly from written texts but seem rather to get wind been part of the oral traditions of the Arab peninsula at Muhammads time. To Muslims, however, this explanation is topsy-turvy the non-canonical Judaic and Christia n stories are simply further textual corruptions of an otherwise almost lost divine original reflected in the Quran.These critics also seek to let on evidence of text evolution and transcription disputes in early Islam the results encounter been meager, but some have expressed hopes that recent discoveries of Quran Graveyards in Yemen will throw more light on the subject.Belief in the Qurans direct, uncorrupted divine origin is fundamental to Islam this of course entails believing that the Quran has neither errors nor inconsistencies. (This is the book in which there is no doubt, a black market to the believers Suratal-Baqarah, verse 2.) However, it is well-known that authorized chronologically posterior verses supersede earliest ones the banning of wine, for instance, was accomplished gradually rather than immediately and certain scholars have argued that some verses which discourage certain practices (for instance,polygamy) without banning them altogether should be under stand as part of a resembling process, though others argue that this contradicts This day have I perfected your religion for you, completed My favor upon you, and chosen for you Islam as your religion (5.3).As to the basic message of the Quran, there are three fundamental points, repeated and restated throughout the work. They are as follows this present tense physical life is a test the afterlife is certain our actions in this present life have consequences in the next.1.2 SunnahThe Sunnah is the second source of Islamic law. Sunnah is an Arabic word which means Method. It was apply by the Prophet Muhammad as a legal term to check what he said, did and agreed to. Its authority is derived from the text of the Quran. The Quran says,For you the life of the Prophet is a model of behaviour(Al-Quran 3321)Many of books of traditions were compiled by the companions of the Prophet. These were later on incorporated in the great collections of Hadith (i.e. traditions) of Bukhari, Muslim etcetera The collectors of the traditions adopted a very scientific system in collection the Traditions. They did not record any tradition except with the chain of narrators. every(prenominal) tradition gives the names of the last narrator of the tradition from whom he learnt the tradition and so on back to the Prophet or Companion of the Prophet. The Sunnah which is established through reliable narrators is fully dependable as legal element.The sunna of the Prophet generally means tradition and includes the following three categories sayings of the Prophet his deeds and his silent or tacit approval of certain acts which he had knowledge of. The record of the Prophets words and deeds were recorded in narrative ahadith, reports that were transmitted before finally being compiled in domineering collections decades after the death of the Prophet.Muhammad brought the Quranic teachings ti life through his interpretation and implementation.The Quran and Sunnah are complementary. The me aning of the Quran is general in nature, the Sunnah makes it specific and special(prenominal). The Sunnah explains the instructions of the Quran. The Quranic injunction is sometimes implicit, the Sunnah makes it explicit by providing essential ingredients and details.Ijma and Qiyas derive their value or authority from the Quran and the Sunnah. Therefore, they are called dependent sources.1.3 IjmaThe third source of law, Ijma or the consensus of scholars signifies the importance of delegated decree to the Muslim community. The Muslim society requires such a rule reservation power to meet the practical problems for the implementation of Islamic Shariah (Islamic Law). Ijma has been technically defined as the consensus of the jurists of a certain period over a religious matter. Ijma is considered a sufficient evidence for action because the Prophet if Islam said, Muslim will never agree on a wrong matter. As such the agreement of the scholars of Islam on any religious matter is a sou rce of law in Islam (Ref Principles of Islamic Jurispredence by M. Hashim Kamali).Ijma or unharmed agreementIjma constitutes the unanimous agreement of a group of jurists of a particular age on a specific issue and constitutes the fourth and final source of law in Shafiis methodology. If questions arose about a Quranic interpretation or an issue where no there no guidance from either the Quran or sunna, jurists applied their own reasoning (ijtihad) to come to an interpretation. Through time, one interpretation would be accepted by more and more doctors of law. tone back in time at the evolved consensus of the scholars, it could be concluded that an ijma of scholars had been reached on this issue. 8 Unfortunately, unanimous agreement rarely happened among intellectual elite and since there were always diverse opinions, one could always find several scholars of the day who concurred on an issue. Also, the definition of ijma and which ijma would be considered valid was a point of con tention, because ijma is not simply the consensus of all past jurists. Besides, using the concept of ijma poses the problem of having to go out to the past to solve the problems of the future, and scholars of yesteryear didnt wrestle the same issues that are dispute Muslims today.1.4 Qiyas or analogyqiyas, is the fourth important source of Islamic law, is reasoning by analogy. In order to apply qiyas to similar cases, the reason or cause of the Islamic rule must be clear. For example, because the Quran clearly explains the reason that consumption of alcohol is prohibited (because it makes the user lose control of his actions), an analogy can be drawn to drugs which induce the same affect. exclusively because the Quran does not specifically state the reason why pork barrel is prohibited, Muslims cannot justify banning another meat product with a similar cholesterol level, etc. The use of analogies greatly varied among scholars for example, Spains Ibn Hazm (10th century) who was f ormidable power of the Zahiri school, rejected the use of qiyas, whereas Imam Abu Hanifa of the Hanafi school (8th century) applied them extensively.Qiyas or analogy is resorted to in respect of problems about which there is no specific purvey in the Quran or the Sunnah of the Prophet. In such issues, the scholars have derived law through analogical deduction on the basis of the comestible of the Quran and the Sunnah on some similar situation. The scholars have genuine detailed principles of analogical deductions or Qiyas in the books of Islamic jurisprudence.Qiyas is a human body of Ijtihad. The Prophet has permitted Ijtihad which literally means to exert. Technically it means to exert with a view to form an independent judgement on a legal issue. Ijtihad is the Islamic method of facing the new situations and problems in the light of the general principles of the book of Allah SWT), the Quran and the traditions of the Prophet or the Sunnah.Apart from Qiyas, there are other met hods of Ijtihad such as Istihsan (that is the juristic preference from different interpretations) and Masalaha (that is moral consideration).In addition to the above sources, the practices of the Khulafa-e-Rashidun (the first four rulers of Islam), the decisions of the judges and the usage of the people are also considered sources of Islamic law in matters which are not spelled out in the Quran and the Sunnah.ConclusionHowever the traditions of the prophet have been questioned for their authenticity. It was also debated as to what extent were the traditions religiously imperative(look for word). The use of analogies was greatly debated. Also there was little unanimous agreement among the Islamic scholars about the inexplicit issues.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment