Virginia Woolf’s a Room of One’s Own

Though published seventy years ago, Virginia Woolfs A path of Ones Own holds no less appeal today than it did then. Modern women spargonrs intuitive feeling to Woolf as a prophet of ecstasy. In November of 1929, Woolf wrote to her friend G. Lowes Dickinson that she penned the book because she treasured to encourage the young womenthey seem to get frightfully depressed (xiv). The mockery here, of course, is that Woolf herself eventually grew so depressed and discouraged that she killed herself. The suicide seems symptomatic of Woolfs possess feelings of oppression within a patriarchal world where unless the speech of men, it seemed, were taken seriously.Nevertheless, women writers still look to Woolf as a liberating force and, in accompaniment, at A Room of Ones Own as an inspiring and empowering work. Woolf biographer Quentin chime notes that the text argues the disabilities of women atomic number 18 social and sparing the woman writer force out altogether survive de bitchiness great difficulties, and despite the prejudice and the economic selfishness of men and the key to emancipation is to be found in the brink of a manner which a woman may call her deliver and which she burn down inhabit with the similar freedom and independence as her brothers. 144) Woolf empowers women writers by first exploring the nature of women and fiction, and then by incorporating notions of androgyny and individuality as it exists in a womans experience as writer. Woolfs first assertion is that women argon spatially hindered in creative life. A woman must see m superstary and a room of her own if she is to write fiction, Woolf writes, and that as you pass on see, leaves the great problem of the true nature of women. . . and fiction unresolved (4). What Woolf seems to read is that creation female stifles creativity.Woolf does not assume, however, that a biological reason for this acerbic exists. Instead, she implies that a womans life conflicts with some(p renominal)thing that is not life (71). In other words, mothering, being a wife, and the general daily, culturally defined expectations of women infringe upon creativity, in particular the makeup of fiction. The smothering reality of a womans life housekeeping and child-rearing duties, for modelling distract a woman from writing. Sadly, Woolf notes, even if a woman in such circumstances manages to write anyway, she exit write in a rage where she should write calmly.She will write foolishly where she should write wisely. She will write of herself where she should write of her characters (69-70). Woolf posits here that an angry woman, writing out of the repression of her day-to-day life, will be an ineffective writer. Finally, Woolf blames the patriarchal culture, as if the freedom of women writing is some infringement of mans power to believe in himself (35). She suggests that men put up women writers because fiction by women somehow diminishes their belief in their own works .Woolfs message, it seems, is that women must rail against the resistance of the patriarchal culture and attain some spot of independence and androgyny. Woolf does not suggest that women write the same as men. In fact, Woolf asserts that it would be a thousand pities if women wrote like men, or lived like men, or looked like men (88). Woolf believes that a mans sentence is not a womans sentence, that the twain will be vastly discordent from each other, though not necessarily one better than the other.Her assertion is that mens sentences are bunglesome in the hands of women because the nerves that feed the brain would seem to differ in men and women (78). This difference of gray matter and neurons would necessarily exit in a difference of perspective and sentence structure. Woolf suggests that for fiction to be artfully done, there must exist a measure of androgyny, a plan of the soul so that in each of us two powers preside, one male, one female (98).In essence, Woolf claims t hat this state of androgyny would allow women the same freedom to express themselves that men seem to afford been inherently indue with. The androgynous mind is resonant and porous, Woolf continues, it transmits emotion without impediment it is naturally creative, light and undivided (98). What Woolf overtly states here is that the ideal creative mind is a marriage, or balance, of the supposed female traits of unrestrainedism with the supposed male traits of productiveness and style. What is implicit, however, is that the female mind can be resonant and porous only when undivided.In other words, a woman can write well only when her mind, like a mans, is not forced to choose between sexual practice and identity, or between her art and societys expectations of her. A woman will write with fluidity and resonance only when she has the same freedom of expression as a man. An additional notion Woolf presents is that women must maintain individuality in their experiences as writers. T his intimacy with ones identity nurtures the creation of fiction, barely only when indite out of ones own temperament and not imitated through anothers. Why are Jane Austens sentences not the right shape for you? Woolf asks Mary Carmichael (80). The idea Woolf reinforces here is that a woman should find and develop her own writing style, not plainly mimic her predecessors. Notice, though, that Woolf does not suggest we glean no stylistic inspiration from women writers like the Brontes and Jane Austen, who paved the way for generations of women writers. Books continue each other, Woolf says, in spite of our habit of judging them separately (80). Continuing something, however, does not mean exploitation the same blueprints or tools during the creative process.What Woolf implies is that every book a woman, seated in that room of her own, produces will generate books from other women. A decimal point of mimicry, of course, is impossible to avoid. A woman writing, Woolf admits, th inks back through her mothers (97). The mothers here are not only biological mothers who give birth to our physical bodies, but also those women who meticulously scratched their way out of patriarchal constraints and into print the women who acted as surrogates to birth generations of women writers.Subtle mimicry would seem a natural act beneath such circumstances, much as a child unconsciously develops personality traits of either parent. Finally, a woman reading Woolfs book has to wonder if that room of ones own is strictly a spatial, physical concept. It is possible that Woolf writes of a psychological construct as a room of ones own, a place one can emotionally go to and write from. Few of us have the luxury of a concrete room of our own, and if we are to be writers, emotional space of our own is the barest necessity.Women who want to write must find some quiet space in their psyches from which they can create. So long as you write what you want to write, that is all that matte rs, Woolf encourages, and whether it matters for ages or only for hours, nobody can say (106). What Woolf seems to say is that what we create within that space of ourselves, within a single moment, is what matters so long as we do it with an eye toward our own individual, androgynous hearts.