Attitudes Towards Technology in the Han and Roman Empires

Attitudes Towards engineering science in the Han and Ro firearm empires DBQ 2 engineering science is al charges changing. New ideas are macrocosm introduced, and innovations to online technologies are always fetching place. Some may see transposes in engineering as a decisive and suspensorful thing, while others may oppose. Upperclass manpowers military positions toward engineering science, especi all(prenominal)y advance handsts within engineering, in the Han Empire, were in truth approving and encouraging. In the Roman Empire, the mass of upperclassmens strengths toward technology were very supportive, as long as the technology or advancement was invented by roundone of a passing philosophical mind.Roman upperclassmen in formulateetary had positive attitudes towards technology, as well as innovations in technology. Some higher classmen, however, looked highly upon themselves, and felt standardized some(prenominal)thing not originating from their minds or hands was below them. Some philosophers had the attitude that anything they did not invent was however middling and sufficient, instead of slight and slap-up. (Doc. 7) Along with that, some upper class political confidential information believed that it was vulgar and degrading of any man to be employed in any field of labor. Doc. 5) I placed these registers in a group unneurotic because of the item that both(prenominal) of the authors of the documents had extremely opinionated outlooks on technology formed by reduce classmen. Both authors stated in their documents that anything cookd by a lower classman was only bonnie in comparison to improvements in technology created by a higher classman equivalent a philosopher. Therefore, their attitudes toward technology was positive as long as it was created by a man higher up in society.In document 7, an upper-class Roman philosopher and advisor to Emperor Nero named Seneca expresses that any tools created by men who are not philo sophers are mediocre and insignificant. His point of survey is that he pure toneings that the minds that did create the current technological advances in tools were supple and sharp, provided not great nor elevated. His attitude towards these breakthroughs in technology are this way because of his role in society. He is a philosopher, so it his is of his role to think with an airlift mind, imagining things from an outside of the box type of erspective. Because philosophers are trained to think this way, they would be able-bodied to create tools and impudently innovations in technology that could completely change how technology was viewed, leading their empires to greater and greater heights. But because of the drop of training and experience in bring up thought, he felt that normal men would tend to come up with soundly tools that were well built and could assist them in their day-to-day lives, but nothing advanced that could conduct everyone captivated and amazed like great and elevated minds like his could invent.While some Roman upper class members want only the technology invented and improved by elevated minds, that wasnt the case for all of Rome. A Roman political drawing card named Gaius Gracchus set up a unfermented system of road building, paying follow attention to the functionality and the appearance of the roads. He helped travelers persist in track of distance by bar out every mile and placing a column there. As well as the columns, Gracchus placed large stones on both sides of the road at lesser intervals, so it would be easier for those who road horses to mount them. (Doc. 6) other brilliant advancement in technology was the aqueducts.Six of the aqueducts flowed into covered containers. Then, the volume was measured by means of calibrated scales. The use of the irrigate was not only used for what was needed, but the water was also utilized for pleasance purposes. (Doc. 8) I grouped these two documents together since they bo th displayed advancements in technology without organism discriminatory against those who were in lower classes. Because they both show the advancements in technology, it is evident that the attitude toward technology was extremely positive. (Doc. 7) members of the Han Empire authorized and embraced new technologies.In fact, many administration officials much implemented new ideas in their societies. For example, Tu Shih, who was the governor of Nanyang, invented a water-powered blowing-engine for the casting of iron agricultural implements that allowed people to enjoy great realise for little labor. Not only has his stratagem been widely used, but it has also been adopt and innovated by those who use it. (Doc. 4) Fuxi, though only a mythological emperor, was said to nourish invented the postage stamp and the plaster. Throughout the years, his invention was vigorously improved in such(prenominal) a way that the ending benefit was change magnitude a hundredfold. (Doc. ) T here were times, as well, when government officials wrote to local officials describing exactly what needed to be done to assist in current problems. Though the government officials came up with such an in-depth plan and strategy, the local officials ultimately do the final call, tailoring the governmental plan to fit the individuality of each town. (Doc. 1) I grouped these documents together because they all invite a leader inventing something, with lower classmen innovating the invention. This proves that the Han Empire had a positive attitude nearly technology, and were still completely open to the aspects of change and advancements.In Document 3, an upper-class Han philosopher named Huan tan expresses, with great enthusiasm, his point of view of the evolution of the pestle and the mortar throughout the years. In the document, it goes in depth describing all of the innovations and advancements the pestle and the mortar have gone through. This exemplifies the fact that Huan c onverts attitude towards innovations in technology was devoutly positive. In Document 3, Huan Tan conveys the story of how Fuxi, who, though mythological, was an emperor, created something, which was improved by regular commoners.This shows that unlike the Roman philosopher in Document 7, Huan Tan shows no inequality against the lower classes. He does not feel that in entrap for truly excellent work, you must have a philosopher title. He understands that ordinary people can be the most brilliant at times, and finds the intact concept of advancement in technology astounding. An additional document I feel would be beneficial in dowry to convey my thesis would be a diary entry from the point of view of a Han Peasant, depicting their attitude towards the new advancements in technology.This is needed because every document we were given was written from the perspective of an upperclassmen. In order to more accurately result the question, I feel like we should have an correspondenc e of every socioeconomic class. I also think that in order to more efficiently analyze Document 2, we need a comparison with the journal entry from a Han Peasant. Because Document 2 talks about how individual familys tools were better than the government-made ones were, I think that a journal entry explaining their thoughts on family-made tools versus the government-made tools would help give a better understanding of the document.