Ethical Dilemma's

A main topic in debate is whether a patient with a disability is able to make the finish to end their life while in a apt state of mind. A big problem with this is that many substantiate a hard time determining whether some(a) star with a physical disability is rational or non. There argon many widely formed ideas about disabled concourse and whether or non they are capable of making decisions as they can no longer be rational.

The problem with mills theory is that it focuses on the consequences of an action and not the decision-making process leading up to that action. Much of the debate against euthanasia is that the bank comes from depression and other influences that would change a individuals mind. This change in thinking may go against a persons values when they were rational and may very lack to be stopped from committing suicide.

However, Mills Utilitarianism does not take these factors into account. In one situation, suicide could be good according to the Utilitarian ideology, and in another it could be immoral, it wholly depends on how much happiness is brought about with the loss of that persons life.



Generally, euthanasia would bring about to a greater extent trouble than happiness, but there are the few circumstances where some ones death might be a better option.

Mills theory also takes more into account other peoples views rather than the one making the decision. A person with a disability would not be able to make decisions for themselves and must make them for the interestingness of others under this way of thinking. It is because Mills Utilitarianism cannot take a firm position on the morality of euthanasia that it is not best ethical theory to use to question the issue.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper