Because of this many expediencys and disadvantages expunge indicate:
The first advantage is that it respects the exact speech of Parliament except in limited situations, where there is a problem using the literal rule, and therefore the golden rule provides an escape route for many judges, much(prenominal) as in the case of Re Sigworth. Next, the literal rule is dependent on words that are clearly clarified and have one meaning. The golden rule allows judges to accept that words have different meanings and postulate an appropriate outcome, such of which the Parliament intended to write. This is clearly visualised in the case of Adler V George where Adler gained access to a RAF localise (a prohibited place within the meaning of the Official Secrets knead 1920) and was actually within its boundaries.
He obstructed a division of Her Majestys forces engaged in security duty in notification to the station in the vicinity of a prohibited place He argued that, as he was actually in the prohibited place, he could not be said to be in the vicinity of the prohibited place, and therefore the defendant was guilty of the crime because in the vicinity of should be interpreted to mean on/in or near the prohibited place. Another advantage is the fact that the golden rule means that judges dont everlastingly have to depend on Parliament for rectifying errors, like Bigamy- (still ground on section 57 of the Offence Against the Persons Act- 1861, because the problem was loosely sorted out in the case Rv Allen. Lastly, the golden rule actually stops absurd outcomes and injustices, again such as that in the case of Rv Allen- (the Bigamy offence).
Along with its advantages the golden rule also has disadvantages. Firstly, it involves and allows judges not just to open and enforce the law, which...If you want to get a full essay, rear it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment