Another group of historians blame the crisis on idle politicians and agitators on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line. Public opinion, they argue, was whipped into a frenzy over issues that competent statesmen could have resolved.

But this viewpoint has been sharply criticized for weakness to ack at one timeledge the depths of feeling that could be aroused by the bondage question and for underestimating the obstacles to a peaceful solution.
The dominant modern view is that the crisis was rooted in profound ideological differences over the righteousness and utility of slavery as an institution. Most interpreters are now agreed that the roots of the conflict lay in the accompaniment that the South was a slave society and determined to hold on that way, while the wedlock was equally committed to a free-labor system. In the words of historian David Potter, slavery really had a polarizing effect, for the North had no slaveholdersâ"at least not of resident slavesâ"and the South had virtually no abolitionists. No other differences divided the regions in this decisive way,...If you want to get a full essay, tell apart it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment